Abstract

This paper describes a new generic metadata model, called CAM Metamodel, that merges altogether information about content, services, physical and technical environment in order to enable homogenous delivery and consumption of content. We introduce a metadata model that covers all these aspects and which can be easily extended so as to absorb new types of models and standards. We ensure this flexibility by introducing an abstract metamodel, which defines structured archetypes for metadata and metadata containers. The metamodel is the foundation for the technical metadata specification. We also introduce new structures in the abstract and core metamodels supporting the management of distributed community created metadata

References

• M. Amielh and S. Devillers. Multimedia Content Adaptation with XML. In Multimedia Modeling, 2001.
• S. Amir, I. M. Bilasco, MD. H. Sharif, and C. Djeraba. Towards a Unified Multimedia Metadata Management Solution. Intelligent Multimedia Databases and Information Retrieval: Advancing Applications and Technologies, IGI Global, 2010.
• Samir Amir, Ioan Marius Bilasco, and Chabane Djeraba. Mumie: Multi-level metadata mapping system. Journal of Multimedia, 6(3):225–235, 2011.
• Ioan Marius Bilasco, Samir Amir, Patrick Blandin, Chabane Djeraba, Juhani Laitakari, Jean Martinet, Eduardo Mart´?nez-Grac´?a, Daniel Pakkala, Mika Rautiainen, Mika Ylianttila, and Jiehan Zhou. Semantics for intelligent delivery of multimedia content. In SAC, pages 1366–1372, 2010.
• Ian S. Burnett, Rik Van de Walle, Keith Hill, Jan Bormans, and Fernando Pereira. Mpeg-21: Goals and achievements. IEEE MultiMedia, 10. (4):60–70, 2003.
• Mark Burstein, Jerry Hobbs, Ora Lassila, Drew Mcdermott, Sheila Mcilraith, Srini Narayanan, Massimo Paolucci, Bijan Parsia, Terry Payne, Evren Sirin, Naveen Srinivasan, and Katia Sycara. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. Website, November 2004.
• Shih-Fu Chang, Atul Puri, Thomas Sikora, and HongJiang Zhang. Introduction to the special issue on mpeg-7. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Techn. , 11(6):685–687, 2001.
• Erik Christensen, Francisco Curbera, Greg Meredith, and Sanjiva Weerawarana. Web Service Definition Language (WSDL). Technical report, March 2001.
• E. Gustafsson and A. Jonsson. Always best connected. IEEE Wireless Communications, 10(1):49–55, February 2003.
• IMS Global Learning Consortium. IMS content packaging XML binding specification version 1. 1. 3. http://www. imsglobal. org/content/packaging/, 2003.
• Elena Ivanova. Wsdl interface of services for distributed search in databases. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Computer systems and technologies, Comp- SysTech '04, pages 1–6, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.
• LOC. Mets (metadata encoding and transmission standard), February 2007. http://www. loc. gov/standards/mets.
• D. L. McGuinness and F v Harmelen. Owl web ontology language overview. feb 2004. http://www. w3. org/TR/owl-features/.
• Akanksha Parmar. Paper review on sharable content object reference model (scorm): Framework for e-learning standard. Advanced Computing and Communication Technologies, International Conference on, 0:409–411, 2012.
• Henning Schulzrinne and ElinWedlund. Application-layer mobility using sip. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. , 4(3):47–57, July 2000.
• Lalitha Suryanarayana and Johan Hjelm. CC/PP for Content Negotiation and Contextualization Mobile Data Management. In Kian-Lee Tan, Michael J. Franklin, and John C. Lui, editors, Mobile Data Management, volume 1987 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, chapter 20, pages 239–245. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, July 2001.
• C. Tsinaraki, P. Polydoros, and S. Christodoulakis. Integration of owl ontologies in mpeg-7 and tv-anytime compliant semantic indexing. In CAiSE, pages 398–413, 2004.