|
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
|
| Volume 187 - Issue 110 |
| Published: May 2026 |
| Authors: Pakhee Dhanke, Shweta Dharmadhikari |
10.5120/ijca3230e5d04312
|
Pakhee Dhanke, Shweta Dharmadhikari . Distinguishing Computational Intelligence, Sentience, and Consciousness in Artificial Systems: A Hybrid Framework and Scenario-Based Analysis. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 110 (May 2026), 9-14. DOI=10.5120/ijca3230e5d04312
@article{ 10.5120/ijca3230e5d04312,
author = { Pakhee Dhanke,Shweta Dharmadhikari },
title = { Distinguishing Computational Intelligence, Sentience, and Consciousness in Artificial Systems: A Hybrid Framework and Scenario-Based Analysis },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
year = { 2026 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 110 },
pages = { 9-14 },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca3230e5d04312 },
publisher = { Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA }
}
%0 Journal Article
%D 2026
%A Pakhee Dhanke
%A Shweta Dharmadhikari
%T Distinguishing Computational Intelligence, Sentience, and Consciousness in Artificial Systems: A Hybrid Framework and Scenario-Based Analysis%T
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%V 187
%N 110
%P 9-14
%R 10.5120/ijca3230e5d04312
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
This paper examines the critical distinctions between computational intelligence, sentience, and consciousness in artificial systems. It argues that clearly separating these concepts is essential for advancing technical development, ethical frameworks, and responsible societal integration of AI. By analysing how computational intelligence simulates rational decision-making but lacks internal subjective experience, and how sentient architectures introduce models of emotional states and simulated inner conflict, this work demonstrates the necessity of understanding both the capabilities and limitations of current AI. Consciousness theory is explored to show how authentic self-awareness and meta-cognitive processes differ from both computational logic and simulated feeling. These distinctions inform pressing questions regarding AI safety, ethical governance, and human-AI interaction. A Hybrid Evaluation Framework integrating Integrated Information Theory (IIT), Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT), and ethical reasoning is proposed and illustrated through scenario-based testing.