Abstract

This paper highlights the importance of monitoring studies, one of the most important aspects of quality systems in education, which reflects the degree of actual results achieved by the educational regulations and the systems of education as well. In addition, it is the most advanced instrument for determining the outcome of the awareness of the educational activities and the use of information systems that are entrusted to monitor, as well as to assess the quality of education and information monitoring systems.

References

• [Cas00] J. Castro, M. Kolp and J. Mylopoulos. Developing Agent-Oriented Information Systems for the Enterprise, Proceedings of the Second International Conference On Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS00), Stafford, UK, July 2000.
• Brophy, J. E. "Teacher Behavior and Its Effects. " JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP 71 (2001): 733-750.
• Fisher, C. W. ; C. D. Berliner; N. N. Filby; R. Marliave; L. S. Cahen; and M. M. Dishaw. "Teaching Behaviors, Academic Learning Time, and Student Achievement: An Overview. " JOURNAL OF CLASSROOM INTERACTION 17(2005): 2-15.
• Nezhnov, P. (2011). SAM – toolkit to assess primary school students' academic achievements. CADMO. Innovations in assessment to meet changing needs. ANNO XIX, 1, pp. 85-9.
• Kardanova E. , Gaponova N. New technologies of assessment: School Achievements Monitoring Toolkit // The paper presented at EDULEARN12, Barcelona, Spain, 2012. http://library. iated. org/view/KARDANOVA2012NEW
• Business Systems Planning-Information Systems Planning Guide, Application Manual GE20-0627, IBM Corporation; available through IBM branch offices.
• Shishoff SE, VA Kal'nei School: monitoring the quality of education. , 2000, 241 p.
• Mayorov, AN Monitoring in Education: Univ. 3rd. , Intelligence Center, 2005, 424 p.
• Adelman, C. 1999. Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and a bachelor's degree attainment. Jessup, MD: U. S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
• Burke, J. C. , and H. P. Minassians, ed. 2003. Reporting higher education results: Missing links in the performance chain. New directions for institutional research, no. 116. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Coburn, C. E. 2003. Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher 32 (6): 3-12.
• Harvey, W. B. 2003. Minorities in higher education 2002-2003: 20th Annual status report. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
• S. Seufert, U. Lechner, and K. Stanoevska. , "A Reference Model for Online Learning Communities". International Journal on E-Learning. 1(1), pp. 43-54, 2002.
• Good, T. L. , and D. A. Grouws. "The Missouri Mathematics Effectiveness Project: An Experimental Study in Fourth-Grade Classrooms. " JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 71(1979): 355-362.
• Medley, D. M. TEACHER COMPETENCE AND TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS: A REVIEW OF PROCESS-PRODUCT RESEARCH. Washington, D. C. : American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 1977. (ED 143 629).