Research Article
Government and Binding Theory for Hindi Language
|
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
|
| Volume 43 - Issue 22 |
| Published: April 2012 |
| Authors: Lalita Kumari, Radhey Shyam, Swapan Debbarma, Nirmalya Kar, Smita Das |
10.5120/6406-8892
|
Lalita Kumari, Radhey Shyam, Swapan Debbarma, Nirmalya Kar, Smita Das . Government and Binding Theory for Hindi Language. International Journal of Computer Applications. 43, 22 (April 2012), 42-45. DOI=10.5120/6406-8892
@article{ 10.5120/6406-8892,
author = { Lalita Kumari,Radhey Shyam,Swapan Debbarma,Nirmalya Kar,Smita Das },
title = { Government and Binding Theory for Hindi Language },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
year = { 2012 },
volume = { 43 },
number = { 22 },
pages = { 42-45 },
doi = { 10.5120/6406-8892 },
publisher = { Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA }
}
%0 Journal Article
%D 2012
%A Lalita Kumari
%A Radhey Shyam
%A Swapan Debbarma
%A Nirmalya Kar
%A Smita Das
%T Government and Binding Theory for Hindi Language%T
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%V 43
%N 22
%P 42-45
%R 10.5120/6406-8892
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract
Government and Binding theory is used to analyze phase structure rules in Natural Language Processing. It is used to filter out grammatically incorrect sentence. Government and Biding (GB) theory is useful and well applicable in English language. This paper shows way to apply GB theory on Hindi Language. For Applying on Hindi, GB theory is modified little bit, but its flavor is intact. Using this, all components and attributes of Government and Binding can be easily described for Hindi language.
References
- Chomsky, Noam (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Berlin:
- Chomsky, Noam (1982). Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding.
- Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. (1993) Principles and Parameters Theory, in Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Berlin: de Gruyter.
- Haegeman, Liliane (1991). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
- Jackendoff, Ray (1977). ¯X Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
- Ouhalla, Jamal (1994). Introducing Transformational Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Sag, Ivan A. , Thomas Wasow and Emily M. Bender (2003). Syntactic Theory. A Formal Introduction. Palo Alto: CSLI Publications.
- Kayne, Richard. 1981. Unambiguous paths. In Levels of syntactic representation, ed. by Robert May and Jan Koster, 143–183. Dordrecht: Reidel.
- Laughlin, Simon, and Terrence J. Sejnowski. 2003. Communication in neuronal networks. Science 301 (26 September 2003): 1870–1874.
- Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding (2nd Ed. ). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
- Cowper, E. A. (1992). A concise introduction to syntactic theory: The Government and Binding approach. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Black, C. A. (1999). A step-by-step introduction to the Government and Binding theory of Syntax. Summer Institute of Linguistics.
- Pollock,Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, UG, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20:365-424.
- Diesing, Molly. 1990. Verb movement and the subject position in Yiddish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8:41-79.
- 1995. Bare phrase structure. Government and Binding theory and the Minimalist Program, edited by Gert Webelhuth, 71-132. Oxford: Blackwell.
- 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Chicago: MIT Press. 1997. Introduction to Government and Binding theory: Semantic roles and Case theory. Notes on Linguistics 77:7-19.
Index Terms
Keywords