Abstract

Managed C# and Delphi Prism in Visual Studio 2008 and Unmanaged Delphi 2009 and C++ Builder 2009 programming languages are increasingly gaining in popularity. In this study, response times of these languages, memory consumptions and code lengths were tested with various work loads and the results belonging to these tests were given. Whether there was a significant difference among the data obtained by the test results was tested by using Friedman test and a significant difference was found. Also, the differences between managed languages and unmanaged languages were revealed by the results of the performance test.

References

• Blackburn, Stephen M.; McKinley, Kathryn S.,e.g., Wake Up and Smell the Coffee : Evaluation Methodology for the 21st Century, Communications of the ACM 51 , 83-89, (2008).
• J.R. Dick, K. B. Kent , J. C. Libby, A quantitative analysis of the .NET common language runtime, Journal of Systems Architecture 54, 679–696, (2008).
• Wikipedi World Wide Web site, http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework
• L. Prechelt, ,An empirical comparison of seven programming languages ,Computer, 33,23 – 29, (2000).
• N. Juristo, A. Moreno, Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation, Kluwer Academic South America, Boston, (2001).
• Codegear C++ Builder (2009): C++ Builder 2009 Web Site: http://www.codegear.com/article/38534/images/38534/CBuilder2009FeatureMatrix.pdf
• Codegear Delphi (2009): Delphi 2009 Website: http://www.codegear.com/article/38548/images/38548/Delphi2009FeatureMatrix.pdf
• P. Fortier, H. Michel, Computer Systems Performance Evaluation and Prediction, Digital Pres,USA, Burlington, (2003) .
• J. G. Allen, , J. S. Jin, , Code Generation for Just-in-Time Compiled Mobile Collector Agents, , ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 161,1-4, (2003).
• J. Sharp, Microsoft Visual C# 2008 Step by Step, Microsoft Pres (USA, Washington, 2007).
• J. Sharp, Microsoft Visual C# 2005 Step by Step, Microsoft Pres USA, Washington, (2005).
• CodeGear RAD Studio 2009 (2009): CodeGear RAD Studio 2009 Web Site: http://www.codegear.com/products/radstudio
• M. Cantù, Delphi 2007 Handbook, Wintech Italia Srl, (2007).
• T. M. Conte, W. Hwu, Benchmark Characterization, System Sciences, 1991. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on 1 364-372, (1991).
• T. M. Conte, W. Hwu , “Benchmark Characterization for Experimental System Evaluation,” Proc. Hawaii Int'l Conf. System Science I, 6-18, (1990).
• R. C. Morin, Managed C# versus Unmanaged C++ (2009): Web Site: http://www.csharphelp.com/archives2/archive458.html
• M. ŞAHİN, Java, Python Ve Ruby Dillerinin Performans Karşılaştırması, Akademik Bilişim 2007 Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, (2007).
• M.Chiş, Evolutionary Decision Trees and Software Metrics for Module Defects Identification, Proceedıngs Of World Academy Of Scıence, Engıneerıng And Technology, 28, 273-277, (2008).
• K. El Emam, A Methodology for Validating Software Product Metrics, National Research Council of Canada,Ottawa, Ontario, Canada NCR/ERC-1076, (2000).
• Ş. Kalaycı,“SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri”, Asil Yayın Dağıtım Turkey, Ankara, (2008).
• J.M. Sá, “Applied Statistics Using SPSS, STATISTICA, MATLAB and R” , Springer Berlin Heidelberg,USA, Newyork, (2007).