Research Article

A Novel Approach for Analysis of CLR & JVM by Performance Metrics ñ A Survey

by  P.Ananda Sekar, S.Hariharan, P.Raguraman
journal cover
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 19 - Issue 1
Published: April 2011
Authors: P.Ananda Sekar, S.Hariharan, P.Raguraman
10.5120/2328-3025
PDF

P.Ananda Sekar, S.Hariharan, P.Raguraman . A Novel Approach for Analysis of CLR & JVM by Performance Metrics ñ A Survey. International Journal of Computer Applications. 19, 1 (April 2011), 8-11. DOI=10.5120/2328-3025 

                        @article{ 10.5120/2328-3025,
                        author  = { P.Ananda Sekar,S.Hariharan,P.Raguraman },
                        title   = { A Novel Approach for Analysis of CLR & JVM by Performance Metrics ñ A Survey },
                        journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
                        year    = { 2011 },
                        volume  = { 19 },
                        number  = { 1 },
                        pages   = { 8-11 },
                        doi     = { 10.5120/2328-3025 },
                        publisher = { Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA }
                        }
                        %0 Journal Article
                        %D 2011
                        %A P.Ananda Sekar
                        %A S.Hariharan
                        %A P.Raguraman
                        %T A Novel Approach for Analysis of CLR & JVM by Performance Metrics ñ A Survey%T 
                        %J International Journal of Computer Applications
                        %V 19
                        %N 1
                        %P 8-11
                        %R 10.5120/2328-3025
                        %I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper is mainly designed to show the evidence to prove difference between the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and Common Language Runtime (CLR). The performance is measured with Execution time, Memory Management and Garbage Collection while executing the programs.

References
  • Sam Shiel and Ian Bayley, March 5, 2005. A Translation-Facilitated Comparison between the Common Language Runtime and the Java Virtual Machine
  • Jeremy Singer, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory. JVM versus CLR: A Comparative Study
  • Herbert schildt 2002.Java 2, Fifth edition. McGraw Hill publications.
  • Bruce Eckel 2000.Thinking in Java, Second Edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  • Matthew MacDonald and Mario Szpuszta, Pro ASP.NET in C# 2005, Apress 2005.
  • Robin A. Reynolds-Haertle,OOP with Microsoft Visual Basic .NET and Microsoft Visual C# Step by Step by Microsoft Press 2002
  • K. Arnold and J. Gosling. The Java Programming Language. Addison Wesley, second edition, 1997.
  • N. Benton, A. Kennedy, and C. Russo. SML .NET, 2002.http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/TSG/SMLNE
  • J. Bull, L. Smith, L. Pottage, and R. Freeman. Benchmarking Java against C and Fortran for scientiÔ¨Åc applications. In Proceedings of the 2001 joint ACM-ISCOPE conference on Java Grande, pages97‚Äì105, 2001.
  • J. Bull, L. Smith, M. Westhead, D. Henty, and R. Davey. A Benchmark Suite for High Performance Java. Concurrency: Practice and Experience,12(6):375‚Äì388, 2000.http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/javagrande/publications.htm
  • C. Cifuentes, M. V. Emmerik, and N. Ramsey. The Design of a Resourceable and Retargetable Binary Translator. In Proceedings of the Sixth Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pages 280‚Äì291, Atlanta, USA, Oct 1999. IEEE, CS Press.
  • GCC Benchmarks, 1999. http://savannah.gnu.org/cgibin/viewcvs/gcc/benchmarks/
  • J. Gough. Compiling for the .NET Common Language Runtime. Prentice Hall, 2002.
  • K. J. Gough. Stacking them up: A Comparison of Virtual Machines, 2001. http://sky.fit.qut.edu.au/~gough/VirtualMachines.ps.
Index Terms
Computer Science
Information Sciences
No index terms available.
Keywords

Execution time Memory Allocations and Garbage Collection

Powered by PhDFocusTM