|
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
|
| Volume 187 - Issue 65 |
| Published: December 2025 |
| Authors: Ambrose Njeru, Evans A.K. Miriti |
10.5120/ijca2025926105
|
Ambrose Njeru, Evans A.K. Miriti . Machine Learning-Driven Detection of Fraudulent Vehicle Insurance Claims. International Journal of Computer Applications. 187, 65 (December 2025), 58-63. DOI=10.5120/ijca2025926105
@article{ 10.5120/ijca2025926105,
author = { Ambrose Njeru,Evans A.K. Miriti },
title = { Machine Learning-Driven Detection of Fraudulent Vehicle Insurance Claims },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
year = { 2025 },
volume = { 187 },
number = { 65 },
pages = { 58-63 },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2025926105 },
publisher = { Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA }
}
%0 Journal Article
%D 2025
%A Ambrose Njeru
%A Evans A.K. Miriti
%T Machine Learning-Driven Detection of Fraudulent Vehicle Insurance Claims%T
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%V 187
%N 65
%P 58-63
%R 10.5120/ijca2025926105
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Fraudulent insurance claims pose a significant financial burden on the vehicle insurance industry, leading to increased premiums for honest customers and substantial losses for insurers. Traditional manual methods for detecting fraudulent claims are inefficient, time-consuming, and prone to errors. This study addresses these challenges by applying and evaluating multiple machine learning techniques to accurately distinguish between genuine and fraudulent vehicle insurance claims. The research specifically aims to characterize the nature of fraudulent vehicle insurance claims, identify key features relevant for model training, assess the performance of various classifiers on both balanced and unbalanced datasets, and develop a web-based system that automates the classification process using the optimal model. Experimental results demonstrate that ensemble methods, particularly AdaBoost and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), outperform other classifiers, achieving a classification accuracy of 84.5%. Logistic Regression shows the poorest performance, while Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) perform better with unbalanced data but degrade with balanced data. Additionally, model scalability remains limited to smaller datasets for all evaluated classifiers. The study’s outcomes provide a practical machine learning-driven framework to enhance fraud detection accuracy and processing efficiency, supporting insurers in mitigating losses and improving risk management.