Abstract

The integration of instructional videos into teaching practices has become increasingly prominent, particularly in online education, due to their ability to engage learners and accommodate diverse learning styles. This study explores the development and impact of video-centric courseware designed to enhance "Assessment as Learning" (AaL) for open and distance learning (ODL) students. AaL emphasizes self-assessment, reflection, and self-directed learning, making video lessons an effective medium for supporting these processes. The study involves the creation of a series of interactive instructional videos on Java programming, adhering to educational theories such as Mayer's Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning and Gagne’s Nine Events of Instruction. These videos incorporate problem-based learning, active learning, and gamification elements to foster engagement and critical thinking. The research involved 40 students from Open University Malaysia, who participated in pre-tests and post-tests to evaluate the effectiveness of the video lessons. The results indicate a significant improvement in students' understanding, with average post-test scores considerably higher than pre-test scores. The interactive nature of the videos, combined with external multimedia links and peer interaction through WhatsApp groups, created a comprehensive and immersive learning environment. This study highlights the potential of well-designed instructional videos to enhance AaL by promoting active learning, self-assessment, and collaboration, ultimately improving learning outcomes in ODL settings.

References

• Apatiga, Y., & Vu, K. P. L. 2022. Comparing the effectiveness of instructor-led versus video-based learning methods for online website accessibility training. In G. Meiselwitz et al. (Eds.), HCI International 2022 - Late Breaking Papers. Interaction in New Media, Learning and Games. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 13517). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22131-6_14
• Ayres, K. M. 2008. Video supports for teaching students with developmental disabilities and autism: Twenty-five years of research and development. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(3), 1-8.
• Bergmann, T. J., & Sams, M. J. 2012. The effect of video modeling with voiceover instruction on accurate implementation of behavior intervention plans. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(2), 98-108.
• Bonk, C. J., & Zhang, K. 2008. Empowering online learning: 100+ activities for reading, reflecting, displaying, and doing. Jossey-Bass.
• Carless, D., & Boud, D. 2018. The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325.
• Center for Teaching, Vanderbilt University. 2020. Effective educational videos. Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/effective-educational-videos/
• Choe, R., Scuric, Z., Eshkol, E., Cruser, S., Arndt, A., Cox, R., Toma, S., Shapiro, C., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Barnes, G., & Crosbie, R. 2019. Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in asynchronous online lecture videos. CBE Life Sciences Education, 18. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-08-0171
• Dann, R. 2014. Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy, and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128
• Fyfield, M., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. 2022. Improving instructional video design: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7296
• Gagné, R. M. 1985. The conditions of learning (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. 2001. Learner experience and efficiency of instructional guidance. Educational Psychology, 21(5), 5-23.
• Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. 2017. Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18-33.
• Lee, S. Y., & Kim, S. 2019. Understanding the antecedents of online learners' flow experiences: A cognitive-affective model. Computers & Education, 137, 15-29.
• Mayer, R. E. 2009. Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. 2003. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
• Owston, R. D., York, D., & Murtha, S. 2011. Lecture capture in large undergraduate classes: Student perceptions and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 262-268.
• Rieg, S. A., & Wilson, B. A. 2009. An investigation of the instructional pedagogy and assessment strategies used by teacher educators in two universities within a state system of higher education. Education, 130(2), 277-294.
• Stavredes, T. 2011. Effective online teaching: Foundations and strategies for student success. Jossey-Bass.
• Sulistyowati, F., Hartanti, S., Widodo, S., & Putrianti, F. 2022. Critical thinking skills in phlegmatic students using learning videos. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v8i2.18874
• Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. 2013. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49.
• Zainuddin, Z. A., & Halili, S. H. 2019. Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), 281-307.
• Zhu, J., Yuan, H., Zhang, Q., Huang, P.-H., Wang, Y., Duan, S., Lei, M., Lim, E. G., & Song, P. 2022. The impact of short videos on student performance in an online-flipped college engineering course. Palgrave Communications, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01234-5