Research Article

Performance Comparison of Inverted Modulation Formats

by  Mehmet Sönmez
journal cover
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 182 - Issue 28
Published: Nov 2018
Authors: Mehmet Sönmez
10.5120/ijca2018918170
PDF

Mehmet Sönmez . Performance Comparison of Inverted Modulation Formats. International Journal of Computer Applications. 182, 28 (Nov 2018), 34-37. DOI=10.5120/ijca2018918170

                        @article{ 10.5120/ijca2018918170,
                        author  = { Mehmet Sönmez },
                        title   = { Performance Comparison of Inverted Modulation Formats },
                        journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
                        year    = { 2018 },
                        volume  = { 182 },
                        number  = { 28 },
                        pages   = { 34-37 },
                        doi     = { 10.5120/ijca2018918170 },
                        publisher = { Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA }
                        }
                        %0 Journal Article
                        %D 2018
                        %A Mehmet Sönmez
                        %T Performance Comparison of Inverted Modulation Formats%T 
                        %J International Journal of Computer Applications
                        %V 182
                        %N 28
                        %P 34-37
                        %R 10.5120/ijca2018918170
                        %I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In this paper, we describe a performance comparison of inverted modulation techniques which are defined as Inverse Pulse Position Modulation (IPPM) and Inverted Manchester Code (IMC) schemes. For AWGN channel, we analyze the bit error rate performance of the techniques. According to simulation results, IMC scheme has better BER performance than that of I-PPM technique Moreover, IMC scheme is experimentally designed by using Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA).

References
  • T. Shang, R. Chen, Y. Liu, ve Y. Gao, “Performance Analysis of IMC in FSO Systems Over Gamma–Gamma Channel”, IEEE Photonics Journal, 10(3), pp. 1-13, Jun. 2018.
  • IEEE Standard 802.15.7-2011, pp. 1-309, Jun. 2011.
  • K. Lee ve H. Park, “Modulations for Visible Light Communications With Dimming Control”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 23(16), ss. 1136-1138, Aug. 2011.
  • J. Yoo, B. W. Kim, ve S. Jung, “Modelling and analysis ofM-ary variable pulse position modulation for visible light communications”, IET Optoelectronics, 9(5), pp. 184-190, 2015.
  • Y. Lu ; S. Wang; L. Hu; X. Hong ; L. Xu, S. He. "Proposal of Inverse Pulse Position Modulation for Downstream Signal in Remodulation PON With PolSK-Modulated Multicast Overlay". IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 24(12), pp. 1012-1014, 2012.
  • R. K.; Y. Kozawa; Y. Umeda ; H. HabuchiInverse, "Pulse Position Modulation Schemes for Simultaneous Visible Light Wireless Information and Power Transfer", 2017 ITNAC, Nov. 2017.
  • J.H. Yoo, R. Lee, J. K. Oh ; H.W. Seo, J.Y. Kim, H.C. Kim. S. Y. Jung. "Demonstration of Vehicular Visible Light Communication Based on LED Headlamp"2013 ICUFN, Jul. 2013
Index Terms
Computer Science
Information Sciences
No index terms available.
Keywords

Inverse 4-Pulse Position Modulation (I-4PPM) Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) Inverted Manchester Code (IMC) wireless optical communication.

Powered by PhDFocusTM