Abstract

Large number of techniques for keyword extraction have been proposed for better matching of documents with the user’s query but most of them deal with tf-idf to find the weight age of query terms in the entire document but this can result in improper result as if a term has a low term frequency in overall document but high frequency in a certain part of the document then that term can be ignored by traditional tf-idf method. Through this paper, the keyword extraction is improved using a hybrid technique in which the entire document is split into multiple domains using a master keyword and the frequency of all unique words is found in every domain . The words having high frequency are selected as candidate keywords and the final selection is made on the basis of a graph which is constructed between the keywords using Word Net. The experiments, conducted on various documents show that proposed approach outperforms other keyword extraction methodologies by enhancing document retrieval.

References

• Information Retrieval Research, Jonathan Furner, School of Information and Media Studies, and David Harper, School of Computer and Mathematical Studies, The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland. (Eds)
• Important problems in information retrieval, Dagobert Soergel College of Library and Information Services University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742
• "Keyword extraction-a review of methods and approaches" Slobodan Beliga University of Rijeka, Department of Informatics Radmile Matejčić 2, 51 000 Rijeka, Croatia
• Effective Approaches For Extraction Of Keywords Jasmeen Kaur, Vishal Gupta, ME Research Scholar Computer Science & Engineering, UIET, Panjab University Chandigarh, (UT)-160014
• Understanding Inverse Document Frequency: On theoretical arguments for IDF, Stephen Robertson Microsoft Research 7 JJ Thomson Avenue Cambridge CB3 0FB UK
• Keyword Extraction using graph based approaches, R. Nagarajan, Dr. S. Anu H Nair, Dr. P. Aruna, N. Puviarasan Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Annamalai University, Tamilnadu, India
• Salton G, Wong A and Yang C, “A vector space model for automatic indexing”, Communications of the ACM, 18(11), 613 – 620, 1975
• Cohen J. D., “Highlights: Language and Domain- independent Automatic Indexing Terms for Abstracting”,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(3): 162 – 174, 1995
• Mihalcea R and Tarau P, “Textrank: Bringing order into texts”, In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Barcelona, Spain, 2004
• Jasmeen and Vishal,"Effective approaches for extraction of keywords", IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 7, Issue 6, November 2010 ISSN (Online): 1694-0814
• Hulth A., “Improved automatic keyword extraction given more linguistic knowledge”, In Proceedings of theConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP'03), 216 – 223, Sapporo, 2003
• Hulth A, “Combining machine learning and natural language processing for automatic keyword extraction”,PhD Thesis, Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, 2004
• Whitney P, Engel D and Cramer N, “Mining for surprise events within text streams”. Proceedings of the NinthSIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 617–627, 2009
• Salton G, Wong A and Yang C, “A vector space model for automatic indexing”, Communications of the ACM, 18(11), 613 – 620, 1975
• I. H. Witten, G. W. Paynter, E. Frank, C. Gutwin, C. G. Nevill-Manning, “Kea: Pra-ctical Automatic Keyphrase Extraction” inProc. of the 4th ACM Conf. of the Digital Libraries, Berkeley, CA, USA, 1999.
• P. D. Turney, “Learning to Extract Keyphrases from Text” in Tech. Report, National Research Council of Canada, Institute for Information Technology, 1999.
• T. D. Nguyen, M.-Y. Kan, „Keyphrase extraction in scientific publications“ in Proc. of ICADL 2007, pp. 317-326, 2007.
• M. Krapivin, A. Autayeu, M. Marchese, E. Blanzieri, N. Segata, “Keyphrases Extraction from Scientific Documents: Improving Machine Learning Approaches with Natural Language Processing” in Proc. of 12th Int. Conf. on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2010, Gold Coast, Australia, LNAI v.6102, pp. 102-111, 2010
• Y. HaCohen-Kerner, “Automatic Extraction of Keywords from Abstracts” in Proc. of 7th Int. Conf. KES 2003 (LNCS v. 2773), pp, 843-849, 2003.
• M. Litvak, M. Last, “Graph-based keyword extraction for single-document summarization” in ACM Workshop on Multi-source Multilingual Information Extraction and Summarization, pp.17-24, 2008.
• Z. Yang, J. Lei, K. Fan, Y. Lai, “Keyword extraction by entropy difference between the intrinsic and extrinsic mode” in Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, V. 392, I. 19, pp. 4523-4531, 2013.
• Slobodan beliga, University of Rijeka, Department of Informatics Radmile Matejčić 2, 51 000 Rijeka, Croatia,"Keyword extraction a review of method and approaches"
• Y Matsuo," Keyword Extraction from a Single Document using Word Co-occurrence Statistical Information",International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools c World Scientific Publishing Company
• "Domain keyword extraction technique: A new weighting method based on frequency analysis" Rakhi Chakraborty ,Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Global Institute Of Management and Technology, Nadia, India
• Willett, P. (2006) The Porter stemming algorithm: then and now. Program: electronic library and information systems, 40 (3). pp. 219-223.